Is there an author? Is the
page signed?
-Yes, the author is Brad Bannon.
And there is a link to his profile.
Is the
author qualified and/or reputable? An expert?
- His profile says,
"Brad Bannon, a
Democratic consultant, is president of Bannon
Communications Research, a
Washington, D.C. based political polling and consulting firm".
Who is the sponsor?
-He is a guest writer for Politix.
Is the sponsor of the page
reputable?
How reputable?
-This particular page was
written by a guest writer. So, it would be more sensible to do more research on
that writer. However, since the website allows anyone to write without using
sources, I would say the site isn't very reliable.
If the page includes neither a
signature nor a sponsor, is there any other way to determine its origin?
-There is a signature and
a sponsor.
Are there links that take you
outside of the site?
-None that I could find.
Is the information reliable and
error-free?
-The writing itself was fine, but
there were some statistics which failed to be cited.
That causes me to be a little worried
about the reliability of the page.
Is there an editor or someone who
verifies/checks the information?
-None that I could find.
Where doubt exists, can the
information be cross-checked with a reliable source?
-No outside sources were
given.
Does the information show a
minimum of bias?
-No, it shows a lot of bias.
Is the page designed to sway
opinion?
-Most definitely.
Is there any advertising on the
page?
-I didn't see any.
Is the page dated?
- It was added Jan. 9th.
All links work.
Is there an indication that the
page has been completed, and is not still under construction?
-It looked completed to me.
What topics are covered? How
in-depth is the material?
- The material is meant to sway the
audience toward favoring gun control. The information is very biased, and no
sources are given. Not very in-depth at all. I don't believe this to be a
reliable source, and would not use it.
Don't forget to do the technical analysis of the website. it looks good so far though. Good attention to determining bias!
ReplyDeleteYou could us it to describe the differing perspective on an issue and to point out the flaws in the argument and discrepancies in factual claims.
ReplyDelete